History

Among those in Ireland who were put out by this was Marshall Bagenal. There is a record of a letter from the Privy Council in Dublin to Bagenal requesting him ‘to spare his house in Newry for Essex and for him to remove himself to some other place for a convenient time’. 

This thing the Marshall positively refused to do.

The following year Essex returned to England and in his stead Sir Henry Sydney (friend of Bagenal’s friend the Earl of Leicester) came to Ireland as Lord Deputy. 

He ‘pacified’ the Pale (put his enemies, the Irish, to fire and sword) and moved northwards on 5^th October with 200 horsemen and 400 foot soldiers. 

Perhaps the friendship mentioned above coloured his view of Bagenal’s estates, as he wrote …

‘I found soche good pollecye and order in the countrie where the Marshall dwelleth, his Landes so well manured, his Tenants so cherished and maintained, the town so well planted with inhabitants, and increased in bewtye and building, as he is much to be commended as well, that he useth his tenants to lyve so welthilye under hym, as his own bountie and large hospitallite and housekepings so able and willinge to geve entertainment to so maney and chiefely, to all those that have occasion to travel to or froe Northwards, his house lyeing in the open highway to their passage’.

The above words are often quoted in Bagenal’s favour. 

The present writer remains most sceptical, especially since Bagenal had point-blank refused the Privy Council’s entreaties the previous year for hospitality on behalf of the former Deputy! 

Sydney was merely promoting his friend – and the soldier who had campaigned before with him in brutally repressing the ‘mere’ Irish. 

One example, the repression of the ‘Desmond Rebellions’ follows …

… more Desmond Rebellions ….

In October Nicholas Bagenal was restored to the position of Marshall – a fairly nominal appointment brought about by the intervention of his friends in high places for he was still apparently landless since Newry remained in the possession of the Irish for quite some considerable time. 

On 12^th November the Queen instructed Sidney to bring Shane to a conference where he might account for his deeds but the proud and victorious O’Neill was not interested. 

In a letter written by Bagenal from Dublin in February 1566, to his friend the Earl of Leicester Nicholas expressed his feelings bitterly. He states that he never knew the country so out of order – robbery, stealing and killing throughout the English Pale.

Shane was in possession of all the countries from Sligo to Carrickfergus, from there to Carlingford and south to Drogheda. 

All this was despite the Queen’s Deputy’s efforts to quell him.  

And he had forged a sure bond with Scotland (which, we remember was in the sixteenth century still an independent country and usually – as then – hostile to England and her interests). 

… death of Shane …

…. more later ….

In the end it was the McDonnells of Antrim who were to be his undoing. 

In the meantime the articles of peace concluded at Westminster on 30^th April 1562 (last history article here) had to be enacted and to that end a meeting was arranged at Dundalk, but Shane failed to appear before the English commissioners. 

He observed the peace terms only fitfully and selectively and the English government was soon plotting against him again. 

Shane was harrying his inferior chieftains (the Armagh O’Neill’s castle at Glassdrummond was taken and fired, for example) and harassed the garrison of Armagh city repeatedly. An English army marched to relieve it and then retreated to its permanent camp at Newry, taking a prey of Shane’s cattle. 

From time to time Shane concluded further pacts with the English: on 18^th November 1563 at Benburb he agreed to wage war on the Queen’s enemies while he further won the right to the title of The O’Neill under Con’s patent. A memorandum in reference to this agreement signed by O’Neill is dated 28^th February 1564 at Fedan. 

This is evidence that Shane O’Neill possessed a castle at Fathom just a few miles from Bagenal’s house at Newry. Bagenal may have even resided there from time to time but likely in Shane’s absence on his many conflicts. 

For example in early 1565 O’Neill confronted the Antrim Scots on their home territory, eventually routing them and taking two leaders, James and Sorley Boy MacDonnell prisoner. This was also in pursuit of his promise to wage war on the Queen’s enemies. 

Again on 25^th August of that year Shane wrote, from Fathom, to the Privy Council informing them of the success of those operations. 

Ironically, in that same month Shane swooped from Fathom to take back the monastic seat – the old Abbey – that even in his memory had been seized by the English adventurer Nicholas Bagenal from the holy monks who had built it and possessed it and ministered to their people there for ages past (more than four hundred years). 

Bagenal appears not to have been at home at the time.

To consolidate his position Shane went on also to seize the Castle of Dundrum on the coast from the Marquis of Kildare. 

Despite this clear signal of Shane’s intent to consolidate his power base throughout Ireland, the rulers of The Pale seemed unwilling to break with him, contenting themselves with requesting the restoration of Newry castle to Bagenal – a request which was scornfully ignored by Shane O’Neill. 

Shane rampant …

… more later …

‘to devise in the mean season how that part which is called Lecale and the Newery and Carlingford may be stayed and preserved from the possession of the Scots ..’.  Clearly the new, young English Queen had no confidence in Mr Bagenal’s ability to defend his ‘possessions’.

A rupture soon occurred between Shane and the Government and in July 1561 Sussex invaded Tyrone but his troops were defeated with great slaughter. Sussex returned again in September. O’Neill refused to engage and his enemies returned to their camp at Newry, driving before them five hundred head of O’Neill’s cattle.

It was the failure of these attempts to subjugate him that drove the English to terms with Shane and occasioned his visit to Elizabeth‘s court. 

In his absence his followers plundered Bagenal’s territories without mercy. 

In writing to Cecil, the Secretary of State on 23^rd April Bagenal complains loudly: he alleges that his lands, which when he was Marshall made

Unwilling or unable to pronounce the correct name of the area – ‘Deasmumhain’, or ‘South Munster‘ – they coined instead the English title Desmond. Previous English conquerors had taken the area and now ruled in what were in effect almost independent principalities. Their leaders were nominally under the Queen.

The provinces of Munster and southern Leinster were dominated, as they had been for over two centuries by the Old English Butlers of Ormonde and Fitzgeralds of Desmond. Both houses raised their own armed forces and imposed their own law, a mixture of Irish and English customs independent of the English government of Ireland in Dublin. They had maintained the old religion too, another bugbear with the English authorities in Dublin and in London. 

Had these houses and their leaders – with other Old English and Irish – acted in concert, they might well have survived the onslaught to come but, if anything, they were more antagonistic to one another than to the English authorities who wished to suppress them. As often, the English exploited this internecine antipathy. 

As we have learned already in relation to Bagenal in the North, the English planned to replace local leaders with provincial presidents (military governors, in effect) and it was in pursuit of this planned policy that Lord Deputy Sidney undertook to confront the Geraldines (the Fitzgerald leaders of Munster) and the Ormondes (Butlers). 

The ‘rebellions’ were primarily about the independence of lords from their monarch but as they progressed they had an increasingly important element of religious conflict. This contributed to the heightened brutality of the subsequent repression. The result of the rebellions was the destruction of the Desmond dynasty and the subsequent plantation of Munster with English settlers.

The local dynasties saw the presidencies as intrusions into their sphere of influence and into their traditional violent competition with each other. This had seen the Butlers and Fitzgeralds fight a pitched battle against each other at Affane in Waterford in 1565. 

Queen Elizabeth summoned the heads of both houses to London to explain their actions.  However, the treatment of the dynasties was not even handed.   Thomas Butler (Earl of Ormonde) who was the Queen’s cousin was pardoned, while (in 1567)  both Gerald Fitzgerald,  Earl of Desmond and his brother, John of Desmond, widely regarded as the real military leader of the Fitzgeralds, were arrested and detained in 1568 in the Tower of London – on Ormonde’s urging.

This removed the natural leadership of the Munster Geraldines and left the Desmond Earldom in the hands of a soldier, James Maurice Fitzgerald, the “captain general” of the Desmond military.   Fitzmaurice perceived no role for himself in the proposed new order in Munster, which envisaged the abolition of the Irish lords’ private armies.  

A factor that drew wider support for Fitzmaurice was the prospect of land confiscations, which had been mooted by Sidney and Peter Carew, an English colonist.  This ensured Fitzmaurice the support of important clans, notably MacCarthy Mor, O’Sullivan Beare and O’Keefe and, indeed two prominent Butlers -brothers of the Earl.  

Fitzmaurice himself had lost the land he had held at Kerricurrihy in Cork which had been leased instead to English colonists.   He was also a devout Catholic, influenced by the Counter-Reformation which made him see the Protestant Elizabethan governors as his enemies.  To discourage Sidney from going ahead with the Lord Presidency for Munster and to re-establish Desmond primacy over the Butlers, he planned a military strike against the English presence in the south and against the Earl of Ormonde.  

Fitzmaurice however had wider aims than simply the recovery of Fitzgerald supremacy. Before the rebellion, he secretly sent Maurice MacGibbon Catholic Archbishop of Cashel  to seek military aid from King Philip II of Spain.

Fitzmaurice launched his insurrection in June 1569 by attacking the English colony at Kerrycurihy before attacking Cork itself and those native lords who refused to join the rebellion.   Fitzmaurice’s force of up to 4,500 men went on to besiege Kilkenny, seat of the Earls of Ormonde in July.   

In response, Sidney mobilised 600 English troops, who marched south from Dublin and another 400 troops landed by sea in Cork.  Thomas Butler, Earl of Ormonde returned from London where he had been at court, brought the rebel Butlers out of the rebellion and mobilised Gaelic Irish clans antagonistic to the Geraldines. 

Together, Ormonde, Sidney and Humphery Gilbert, appointed as governor of Munster, began devastating the lands of Fitzmaurice’s allies.  As Bagenal was Marshall and fought in this campaign, we must assume at the very least that he was a willing participant in all that followed.

As individual lords felt compelled to retire to defend their own territories under this onslaught, Fitzmaurice’s forces broke up.  Gilbert in particular was notorious for the terror tactics he employed, killing civilians at random and setting up a corridor of severed heads at the entrance to his camps.

In late 1569 a similar but shorter insurrection broke out in England, but was quickly crushed.  This and the Desmond Rebellion caused the Pope in early 1570 to issue in support “Regnans in Excelcis’.  This became the excuse needed by the English authorities for their ever more barbarous actions and Queen Elizabeth’s previous acceptance of Roman Catholic worship in private turned into a more active suppression of organised Catholic services.

Sidney forced Fitzmaurice into the Kerry Mountains, from where he launched hit and run attacks on the English and their allies.  By 1570 most of Fitzmaurice’s allies had submitted to Sidney.  The most important, Donal MacCarthy Mor surrendered in November 1569.  Nevertheless, the guerrilla campaign dragged on for three more years.

In February 1571, John Perrot was made Lord President of Munster, pursuing Fitzmaurice with 700 troops for over a year without success.  Fitzmaurice had some victories, capturing an English ship near Kinsale and burning the town of Kilmallock in 1571, for example, but by early 1573, his force was reduced to less than 100 men.

Fitzmaurice finally submitted on February 23, 1573, having negotiated a pardon for his life.  However in 1574, he again became landless and in 1575 he sailed to France to seek help from the Catholic powers to start another rebellion.

Gerald Fitzgerald, Earl of Desmond, and his brother John were released from prison to stabilise the situation and to reconstruct their shattered territory.  Under a new settlement imposed after the rebellion, known as “composition”, the Desmond’s military forces were limited by law to just 20 horsemen and their tenants made to pay rent to them rather supply military service or to quarter their soldiers.  

Perhaps the biggest winner of the first Desmond Rebellion was the Earl of Ormonde, who established himself as loyal to the English Crown and as the most powerful lord in the south of Ireland.

Although all of the local chiefs had submitted by the end of the rebellion, the methods used to suppress it provoked long-lasting resentment, especially among the Irish mercenaries, gall oglaigh or “gallowglass” as the English termed them, who had rallied to Fitzmaurice.   

William Drury, the new Lord President of Munster from 1576, executed around 700 of them in the years after the rebellion.  Furthermore, in the aftermath of the rebellion, Gaelic customs such as Brehon Laws, Irish dress, bardic poetry and the maintaining of private armies were again outlawed – things that were highly provocative to traditional Irish society but which would have met with Bagenal’s approval.

Fitzmaurice had deliberately emphasized the Gaelic character of the rebellion, wearing the Irish dress, speaking only Irish and referring to himself as the captain (taoiseach) of the Geraldines.  

Finally, Irish landowners continued to be threatened by the arrival of English colonists.  All of these factors meant that, when Fitzmaurice returned from continental Europe to start a new rebellion, there were plenty of discontented people in Munster waiting to join him.

The second Desmond rebellion was sparked when James Fitzmaurice Fitzgerald launched an invasion of Munster in 1579.  During his exile in Europe, he had reinvented himself as a soldier of the counter-reformation, arguing that since the Pope’s excommunication of Elizabeth I in 1570 Irish Catholics no longer owed loyalty to a heretic monarch. The Pope granted Fitzmaurice an “indulgence” and supplied him with troops and money.

Fitzmaurice landed at Smerwick, near Dingle on July 18, 1579 with a small force of Spanish and Italian troops.  He was joined in rebellion on August 1 by John of Desmond, a brother of the Earl, who had a large following among his kinsmen and the disaffected swordsmen of Munster. Other Gaelic clans and Old English families also joined in the rebellion.  After Fitzmaurice was killed in a skirmish with the Clanwilliam Burkes on August 18, John Fitzgerald assumed leadership of the rebellion.

Gerald, the Earl of Desmond, initially resisted the call of the rebels and tried to remain neutral but joined in once the authorities proclaimed him a traitor.  The Earl joined the rebellion by sacking the towns of Youghal (on November 13) and Kinsale, and devastated the country of the English and their allies.

However by the summer of 1580 English troops under William Pelham and locally raised Irish forces under the Earl of Ormonde succeeded in bringing the rebellion under control, re-taking the south coast, destroying the lands of the Desmonds and their allies in the process, and killing their tenants.  By capturing Carrigafoyle at Easter 1580, the principal Desmond castle at the mouth of Shannon river, they cut off the Geraldine forces from the rest of the country and prevented a landing of foreign troops into the main Munster ports. It looked as if the rebellion was fizzling out.

However, in July 1580, the rebellion spread to Leinster, under the leadership of Gaelic Irish chieftain Fiach MacHugh O’Byrne and the Pale Lord Viscount Baltinglass

First he subjected the local chiefs of our area (O’Hanlon and Magennis) to his power and made them his uriaghts. 

Where Bagenal was at this time we are uncertain, but as he later took frequent refuge in Greencastle – which he seemed to prefer as a home to Newry – it is not unlikely that he was there.

The English were not to take it all lying down. On 1^st February a commission was granted to William Ashely and Thomas Bramley to execute martial law in the territories of Newry, Mourne and Cooley. As Small (in his ‘Sketch’) remarked, ‘such arbitrary proceedings cannot have tended by any means to pacify the country or reconcile it with English rule’.

Nor did it work. 

The government was compelled to send Sir Henry Sidney with an army to Dundalk in the same year of 1559 to confront Shane O’Neill. 

Avoiding open conflict on this occasion, Shane invited Sidney to a friendly visit: the invitation was accepted and shortly after, the English army was withdrawn.

For the time being Shane O’Neill retained hegemony in his own domain. 

Bagenal remained slighted. He probably chose not to have O’Neill look down in dominating fashion from his castle at Fathom: we can reasonably surmise that he remained in retreat elsewhere – Greencastle being the most likely place.

… Desmond rebellions …

… more later ….